After assisting with multiple jury trials, I can see why the prosecutors who litigate criminal cases involving minors would want female jurors. A woman’s natural “mama bear” instinct to protect her children would cause any attorney to assume women, especially mothers, would want justice for any child who was harmed. But after watching the reactions to the Lindsay Clancy trial, and the interviews of the female jurors on the case, I can’t help but wonder: What happened?
A staggeringly large handful of both liberal and conservative women seem to be losing their moral convictions over this case. When it comes to the Epstein files, everyone wants them released so the perpetrators can be charged for their crimes of harming children, right? Yet when the defendant is a woman and not a man, all of a sudden these onlookers aren’t worried about the crime committed and the victims who suffered. Instead, they are worried about the defendant — worried that she didn’t have enough help (which she did), that she did not have resources (which she did), and that her husband wasn’t helping her (which he was).
One of the female jurors who was interviewed made a shocking statement when discussing the ma...